Quality Indicator Repository

Quality indicators are standardised, evidence-based measures used to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of care. The ACAC developed a Quality Indicator Repository. For information on its development see this document.

Please navigate the Quality Indicator Repository to learn about the quality indicators we identified across care settings and their defining, data, and source attributes.  You can also use the Quality Indicator Repository to download quality indicators of interest to you.

Showing 1-5 of 5 results
Showing 1-5 of 5 results
Remove all filters
Download results
Palliative CareUnited States of AmericaCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): Hospice Quality Reporting Program

The Hospice Care Index (or HCI) is an index measure; it scores hospices on a 0 to 10 scale using ten Medicare claims-based indicators which capture a broad array of information on hospice service provision. The HCI provides information that reflects care processes during a hospice stay and allows patients, families, and caregivers to make informed decisions. Collectively these indicators represent different aspects of hospice service and thereby characterize hospices comprehensively, rather than on just a single care dimension. Each indicator equally affects the single HCI score, reflecting the equal importance of each aspect of care delivered from admission to discharge.

Palliative CareUnited Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of ManNational Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL) program

This summary indicator includes 5 questions covering families and others needs, emotional, practical, spiritual, religious and cultural support and being informed about the patient's condition and treatment. All questions include response options on a 5-point Likert-scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Neither agree not disagree, Disagree, Strongly disagree or N/A/Not sure). Questions include: I was asked about my needs; I was given enough emotional help and support by staff; I was given enough practical support (for example with finding refreshments and parking arrangements); I was given enough spiritual/religious/cultural support; I was kept well informed and had enough opportunity to discuss their condition and treatment with staff.

Palliative CareBelgiumQuality Indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC)

When you consider all aspects of your life—physical, psychological, social, spiritual, existential, and financial—your quality of life over the past 2 days was:(very bad) 0 ———————— 10 (excellent).

Palliative CareUnited States of AmericaCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): Hospice Quality Reporting Program

Individual survey item included as part of the CAHPS® Hospice Survey asking respondents: "Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst hospice care possible and 10 is the best hospice care possible, what number would you use to rate your family member's hospice care?" Response options are on a 0-10 rating scale, with 0=Worst hospice care possible and 10=Best hospice care possible.

Palliative CareUnited Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of ManNational Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL) program

This staff-reported summary measure includes 11 questions regarding staff confidence in delivering end of life care: I am confident I can recognise when a patient might be dying imminently (within hours to days); I feel confident in my skills to communicate clearly and sensitively to dying patients and those important to them; I am confident I have the skills to involve the dying patient and those important to them in decisions about end of life care in line with their wishes and preferences; I know how to access specialist palliative care advice, if required, when addressing specific end of life care needs for dying patients; I know how to respond to requests to die outside of the hospital setting from dying people and/or those important to them; I feel confident to respond to the practical and social needs of the dying person; I feel confident to respond to the spiritual, emotional and cultural needs of the dying person; I am confident in my ability to discuss hydration options with dying patients and those important to them; I am confident in assessing and managing patient pain and physical symptoms at the end of life; I feel confident to respond to the practical and social needs of those important to the dying person; I feel confident to respond to the spiritual, emotional and cultural needs of those important to the dying person.

Filters
Remove all filters
Care Setting
Aged Care
Care Transitions
Dementia Care
Palliative Care
Rehabilitation Care
Rural and Remote Care
Country
Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Denmark
England
Finland
Germany
Hong Kong (SAR of China)
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Scotland
Singapore
Solomon Islands
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Timor-Leste
United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man
United States of America
Vietnam
Wales
Zambia
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
Process
Structure
Domain
Multidimensional
Remove
Access
Access / Waiting Times
Adverse Events
Appropriate Care
Behavioural Symptoms
Care of the Patient at the End of Life
Caregiver Distress
Cognition
Communication
Consumer Experience
Continence / Elimination
Depression
Diagnosis
Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care
Falls / Fracture / Injury
Follow-Up
Function / Activities of Daily Living
Functional Change
Governance
Hospital Readmission
Hospitalisation
Infection Control
Interventions to Promote Cognition, Independence and Wellbeing
Managing Other Long-Term Conditions
Medication-Related
Mortality
Other
Other Clinical
Other Outcomes of Care
Pain
Palliative Care
Person-Centred Care
Physical Aspects of Care
Physical Restraint
Pressure Injury
Psychological and Psychiatric Aspects of Care
Quality of Life
Resource Use
Resources
Risks During Hospitalisation
Service Delivery
Service Delivery / Care Planning
Social Aspects of Care
Spiritual, Religious, and Existential Aspects of Care
Structure and Processes of Care
Supporting Carers
Wait Time / System Access
Weight Loss / Nutrition
Workforce
IOM Quality Dimension
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Equity
Person-Centredness
Safety
Timeliness
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
Yes