Ratio of Full-Time Clinical Technicians to the Number of Full-Time Professionals
Identifying Attributes
Care Settings
Rehabilitation Care
Country
Canada
Publishing Organisation
Zidarov et al. (2017)
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Safety
Domain
Resources
Defining Attributes
Definition
Numerator
Denominator
Exclusions
Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments
Stratifications
Collection and Reporting Attributes
Type of Data Collection
Administrative data
Data Collection Methods
Rehabilitation organisation
Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Annually
Reporting Frequency in Days
365
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No
Source and Reference Attributes
Evidence Source
Zidarov D, Poissant L, Sicotte C. Use of comparative performance indicators in rehabilitation. Health Care Manage Rev. 2017;42(2):142-50.
Technical Specifications
Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025
Contents
Actions
Date Modified 02 December 2025