IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Change in Self-Care Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients (NQF #2633)

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Rehabilitation Care
Country
United States of America
Publishing Organisation
Deutsch et al. (2022)
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Effectiveness
Domain
Functional Change

Defining Attributes

Definition

Calculation specifics in online appendix

This measure estimates the risk-adjusted mean change in self-care score between admission and discharge for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Medicare Part A and Medicare Advantage patients.

Numerator

The measure does not have a simple form for the numerator and denominator. This measure estimates the risk-adjusted change in self-care score between admission and discharge among Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Medicare Part A and Medicare Advantage patients age 21 or older. The change in self-care score is calculated as the difference between the discharge self-care score and the admission self-care score.

Denominator

The denominator is the number of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Medicare patient stays, except those that meet the exclusion criteria.

Exclusions

Calculation specifics in online appendix (no info in online appendix, found the followings in the NQF # 2633)

This quality measure has six patient-level exclusion criteria:

1) Patients with incomplete stays. Rationale: When a patient has an incomplete stay, for example, the patients leave urgently due to a medical emergency, it can be challenging to gather accurate discharge functional status data. Patients with incomplete stays include patients who are unexpectedly discharged to an acute care setting (Short-stay Acute Hospital, Critical Access Hospital, Inpatient Psychiatric Facility, or Long-term Care Hospital); patients who die or leave an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) against medical advice; and patients with a length of stay less than 3 days.

2) Patients who are independent with all self-care activities at the time of admission. Rationale: Patients who are independent with all the self-care items at the time of admission are assigned the highest score on all the self-care items, and thus, would not be able to show functional improvement on this same set of items at discharge.

3) Patients with the following medical conditions on admission: coma; persistent vegetative state; complete quadriplegia; locked-in syndrome; or severe anoxic brain damage, cerebral oedema or compression of the brain. Rationale: These patients are excluded because they may have limited or less predictable self-care improvement with the selected self-care items.

4) Patients younger than age 21. Rationale: There is only limited evidence published about functional outcomes for individuals with Medicare who are younger than 21.

5) Patients discharged to Hospice. Rationale: Patient goals may change during the IRF stay, and functional improvement may no longer be a goal for a patient discharged to hospice.

6) Patients who are not Medicare Part A and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Rationale: IRF-PAI data for patients not covered by the Medicare program are not submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Facility-level quality measure exclusion: For IRFs with fewer than 20 patient stays, data for this quality measure are not publicly reported.

Use of Risk Adjustment
Yes
Risk Adjustments

Statistical risk model

Stratifications

Calculation specifics in online appendix (no info in online appendix)

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Data Collection Methods
Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods

Not applicable - being developed

Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Evidence Source

Deutsch A, Palmer L, Vaughan M, McMullen T, Karmarkar A, Kwon S, et al. Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Change in Self-Care and Change in Mobility Quality Measures: Development and Reliability and Validity Testing. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022;103(6):1105-12.

Technical Specifications
Link to Measurement Tools

Related to IRF-PAI tool (Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals, GG0130)

Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025