Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation
Identifying Attributes
Care Settings
Rehabilitation Care
Country
Japan
Publishing Organisation
Ohtera et al. (2017)
Type of Quality Indicator
Process
IOM Quality Dimension
Timeliness
Domain
Accessibility
Defining Attributes
Definition
Numerator
Denominator
Exclusions
Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments
Stratifications
Collection and Reporting Attributes
Type of Data Collection
Administrative data
Data Collection Methods
Data source: recorded voluntarily
Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No
Source and Reference Attributes
Evidence Source
Ohtera S, Kanazawa N, Ozasa N, Ueshima K, Nakayama T. Proposal of quality indicators for cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome in Japan: a modified Delphi method and practice test. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e013036.
Technical Specifications
Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025
Contents
Actions
Date Modified 02 December 2025