Improvement in Depression at Completion of Cardiac Rehabilitation

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Rehabilitation Care
Country
United States of America
Publishing Organisation
American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Quality of Care Committee: American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Performance Measures
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Effectiveness
Domain
Other Outcomes of Care

Defining Attributes

Definition
Numerator

The number of patients whose depression screening score is at least in the mild range at intake to CR who reduce symptom severity by at least 1 level by the time they complete the CR program.

Denominator

The total number of patients who complete a depression screening instrument upon intake and completion of CR, and whose depression screening score is at least in the mild range at intake to CR.

Exclusions

Denominator Exclusions • Inability to complete the depression instruments with reasonable accommodations o Examples of Reasonable Accommodations:  Staff member reads instrument instructions and questions to the patient  Staff member enters patient's responses to test items to the instrument • Presence of comprehension limitation that precludes completion of the instrument • Lack of availability of the tool used by the CR program in a language understood by the patient

Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments
Stratifications

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Electronic/paper chart records
Data Collection Methods

Data Sources: Medical record or another database (e.g., administrative, clinical, registry).

Frequency of Data Collection
Period of assessment: Up to 12 months
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Evidence Source

Pack QR, Bauldoff G, Lichtman SW, Buckley M, Eichenauer K, Gavic A, Garvey C, King ML; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Quality of Care Committee. Prioritization, Development, and Validation of American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Performance Measures. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 Jul;38(4):208-214. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000358

Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025