Improvement in Functional Capacity at Completion of Cardiac Rehabilitation

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Rehabilitation Care
Country
United States of America
Publishing Organisation
American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Quality of Care Committee: American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Performance Measures
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Effectiveness
Domain
Functional Change

Defining Attributes

Definition
Numerator

Number of patients who increase their functional capacity by the percent specified in the measure description from the beginning to the completion of their CR program, as measured by either symptom-limited graded exercise testing, estimated exercise peak METs, or 6MWT distance.

Denominator

Number of patients who completed CR during the measurement period. A patient is defined as having completed CR if he/she has completed a minimum of 4 week of the CR program and has undergone a final, formal discharge assessment session and updated treatment plan.

Exclusions

Denominator Exclusions • Patients for whom a 6MWT would be contraindicated due to acute or unstable medical conditions (see detailed list in reference 3 for a complete list). • Patients who are unable to perform a 6MWT due to orthopaedic, neurological, cognitive or psychiatric impairments and/or safety reasons. • Patients who have not completed at least 10 PR sessions within 3 months of program entry • Patients with diagnosed pulmonary vascular disease (ie, pulmonary hypertension) or other primary lung disease process (ie, lung cancer).

Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments
Stratifications

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Electronic/paper chart records
Data Collection Methods

Data Sources: Medical record or another database (e.g., administrative, clinical, registry).

Frequency of Data Collection
Period of assessment: Up to 12 months
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Evidence Source

Pack QR, Bauldoff G, Lichtman SW, Buckley M, Eichenauer K, Gavic A, Garvey C, King ML; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Quality of Care Committee. Prioritization, Development, and Validation of American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Performance Measures. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 Jul;38(4):208-214. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000358

Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025