Inpatients Referred to a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Rehabilitation Care
Country
Canada
Publishing Organisation
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society: Quality Indicators for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention
Type of Quality Indicator
Process
IOM Quality Dimension
Timeliness
Domain
Accessibility

Defining Attributes

Definition

The percentage of eligible inpatients referred to a Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) Program.

Numerator

A subset of the denominator representing a number of inpatients who were referred to a CR Program prior to hospital discharge. A referral is deemed being made if both of the following criteria are satisfied: 1. There is an official written or electronic communication on behalf of the health care provider for referral to CR and 2. The referral information has been received by the CR program

Denominator

The number of eligible inpatients in the reference period with any of the conditions or interventions listed below: • Acute coronary syndrome; o Acute Myocardial Infarction (STEMI, non-STEMI); o Unstable angina; • Chronic stable angina; • Stable heart failure; • Percutaneous coronary intervention; • Coronary artery bypass surgery; • Cardiac valve surgery

Exclusions

Denominator exclusions: • CR eligible inpatient with a documented medical reason for non-referral, such as comorbid life-threatening condition, serious mental illness, or inability to ambulate. • CR eligible inpatient with a documented patient-centred reason for non-referral. • CR eligible inpatient discharged to long-term care facility or inpatient rehabilitation. • CR eligible inpatient who died prior to discharge.

Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments
Stratifications

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Electronic/paper chart records
Data Collection Methods

Method of Calculation: Numerator / Denominator * 100. Sources of data: Electronic medical records, retrospective chart review, prospective flow sheets, Provincial and territorial hospital discharge abstract databases, CIHI hospital database, and/or cardiac registries

Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
Yes

Source and Reference Attributes

Evidence Source

Canadian Cardiovascular Society. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Quality Indicators E-Catalogue, Quality Indicators for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention, A CSS Consensus Document. 2013 Accessed May 2023:[5 p.]. Available from: ccs.ca/app/uploads/2020/12/Indicator_CR.pdf. Grace SL, Poirier P, Norris CM, Oakes GH, Somanader DS, Suskin N. Pan-Canadian development of cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention quality indicators. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(8):945-8. Somanader DS, Chessex C, Ginsburg L, Grace SL. Quality and Variability of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Delivery. Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention. 2017;37(6):412-20.

Technical Specifications

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Quality Indicators E-Catalogue Top 5 QIs developed Page 5. ccs.ca/app/uploads/2020/12/Indicator_CR.pdf Grace 2013 (research paper on development process of indicators reported on e-catalogue) www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X14002335?via%3Dihub#sec1 Supplement to Grace 2013 paper ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0828282X14002335-mmc1.pdf Further research on functional change on Canadian Cardiovascualr Society QIs www.cjcopen.ca/article/S2589-790X(21)00132-3/fulltext No public information on registry and website posts are back from 2014: cacprcacpr.wordpress.com/2014/04/25/data-dictionary-2-0/ Suggest that QIs are likely collected via a registry that requires a paywall: www.corhealthontario.ca/Quality-Indicators-for-Virtual-Cardiovascular-Rehabilitation-during-COVID-19-and-Beyond-(May-22-2020).pdf

Link to Measurement Tools

Canadian Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Registry (Cardiologica) (Not publically available and likely used via pay wall. )

Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
Yes
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
04 November 2025