Put at Ease During Physical Examination by a GP in Advanced Age

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Primary Care
Country
New Zealand
Publishing Organisation
Life and Living in Advanced Age (LiLACS)
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Person-Centredness
Domain
Consumer Experience

Defining Attributes

Definition

Participants were asked, 'In the last year have you visited or had a visit from any of the following health professionals?' and they could choose as many as were relevant from the following list: general practitioner, practice nurse, pharmacist, optometrist.

Numerator
Denominator
Exclusions
Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments

None

Stratifications

Sex, ethnicity, areas with socioeconomically deprivation

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Administrative data
Data Collection Methods

Life and Living in Advanced Age: a Cohort Study in New Zealand—Te Puāwaitanga O Ngā Tapuwae Kia Ora Tonu (LiLACS NZ). Data were gathered in face-to-face, standardised interviews with Māori aged 80-90 and non-Māori aged 85 at home. Nursing assessments of physical function and cardiorespiratory health were also completed. The LiLACS NZ sample lives within the boundaries of the Bay of Plenty and Lakes District Health Boards, excluding the Taupo region of Lakes DHB. The participants were first interviewed and assessed in 2010 (the 'first wave' of data collection). This is a longitudinal study with annual data collection, subject to mortality and participant retention. This report is based on data from Wave 1 about primary health care services used by participants, and on data from Wave 2 about perceptions of their GP care.

Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
Yes
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025