Workforce Development Measure Derived From Workforce Development Domain of the C-CAT

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Primary Care
Country
United States of America
Publishing Organisation
public reporting, Quality improvement (Internal to the specific organization), Quality Improvement with Benchmarking (external benchmarking to multiple organizations)
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Person-Centredness
Domain
Workforce

Defining Attributes

Definition

0-100 measure of workforce development related to patient-centred communication, derived from items on the staff and patient surveys of the Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit

Numerator

Workforce development component of patient-centred communication: an organisation should ensure that the structure and capability of its workforce meets the communication needs of the population it serves, including by employing and training a workforce that reflects and appreciates the diversity of these populations. Measure is scored on 2 items from the C-CAT patient survey and 21 items from the C-CAT staff survey. Minimum of 100 patient responses and 50 staff responses.

Denominator

There are two components to the target population: staff (clinical and nonclinical) and patients. Sites using this measure must obtain at least 50 staff responses and at least 100 patient responses.

Exclusions

Staff respondents who do not have direct contact with patients are excluded from questions that specifically address patient contact.

Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments

None

Stratifications

None

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Surveys
Data Collection Methods

Instrument-Based Data

Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Evidence Source
Technical Specifications
Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
Yes
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025