Care Rated by Patient as Excellent or Very Good
Identifying Attributes
Care Settings
Country
Publishing Organisation
Type of Quality Indicator
IOM Quality Dimension
Domain
Defining Attributes
Definition
Proportion of patients aged 45 and over who rated the quality of care received from their usual GP or others in their usual place of care, in the preceding 12 months, as excellent or very good. Based on the question: 'Overall, how do you rate the quality of health care that you have received from your usual GP or usual place of care over the last 12 months?' The response options were: 1. Excellent, 2. Very good, 3. Good, 4. Fair, 5. Poor, 6. Not stated, 7. Not applicable.
Numerator
The sum of calibrated sample weights for patients who answered 'Excellent' or 'Very good' to the survey question.
Denominator
The sum of calibrated sample weights for all responses to the question by patients with a usual place of care and/or a usual GP and visited either of them in the previous 12 months.
Exclusions
Not stated' and 'Not applicable' were excluded from the denominator.
Use of Risk Adjustment
Risk Adjustments
Results are presented as crude rates due to the small differences with direct age-standardisation rates (to the Australian estimated resident population) which are less appropriate for the focus on patient-reported experience measures.
Stratifications
By Primary Health Network (PHN), sex, age group in years (45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, 85+), remoteness area (major cities, inner regional, outer regional, remote/very remote), main language spoken at home (English, other language), private health insurance coverage, highest level of educational attainment, self-assessed patient health status, number of long-term health conditions (none, 1, 2, 3 or more).
Collection and Reporting Attributes
Type of Data Collection
Data Collection Methods
The Survey of Health Care 2016