Percentage of Patients With Moderate to Severe Pain

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Palliative Care
Country
Netherlands
Publishing Organisation
The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, ZonMw project
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Effectiveness
Domain
Physical Aspects of Care

Defining Attributes

Definition

Pain is a common symptom in the palliative phase. The quality of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions influences the severity of pain. Pain is measured with a numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from zero to 10 and moderate to severe pain is classified as the number of patients with a pain score of 4 or above (average over three days). The question is: Which score from zero to 10 would you give for pain? The patient must decide on the score independently. If the patient's health status permits, the patient should preferably also hold the pen.

Numerator

The number of patients with a pain score of 4 or above on the numerical rating scale (average over three days)

Denominator

The total number of patients for whom this indicator is measured

Exclusions

Comatose and deeply sedated patients

Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments

None

Stratifications

By cognitive impairment status

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Surveys
Data Collection Methods

This indicator must be measured on three consecutive days (1 a day) on a numerical rating scale (NRS). As far as possible, the measurements should take place at the same time each day (e.g., before the daily care rounds). Numerical rating scales are implemented by clinical staff. The question is: Which score from zero to 10 would you give for pain? The patient must decide on the score independently. If the patient's health status permits, the patient should preferably also hold the pen. Pain can be measured in patients with moderate to (very) severe cognitive impairments but not with a numerical rating scale (NRS). Pain in these patients can be measured with a pain observation instrument that was specifically developed for the measurement of patients with cognitive impairments: the Rotterdam Elderly Pain Observation Scale. Measurements with this instrument should also take place on three consecutive days (1 a day) as far as possible at the same time each day (e.g., before the daily care rounds).

Frequency of Data Collection
1 day (on three consecutive days)
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
1
Reporting Methods
Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Evidence Source

Multiple sources: Virdun C, Luckett T, Lorenz KA, Phillips J. National quality indicators and policies from 15 countries leading in adult end-of-life care: a systematic environmental scan. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Jun;8(2):145-154. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001432; De Roo ML, Leemans K, Claessen SJ, Cohen J, Pasman HR, Deliens L, Francke AL; EURO IMPACT. Quality indicators for palliative care: update of a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Oct;46(4):556-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.013; Claessen, S et al. (2011). A New Set of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care: Process and Results of the Development Trajectory. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 42(2), 169–82.

Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Can the Quality Indicator be Readily Implemented at a Population Level in Australia Given its Current Data Landscape?
Implementation of this quality indicator was not assessed.
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
31 March 2026