Unplanned/Unexpected Same Hospital Readmissions of Patients Discharged Following Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Care Transitions
Country
Australia
Publishing Organisation
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC): National Core Hospital-based Outcome Indicators
Type of Quality Indicator
Outcome
IOM Quality Dimension
Effectiveness
Domain
Hospitalisation

Defining Attributes

Definition

Percentage of unplanned and unexpected readmissions to the same-hospital following admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Unplanned /unexpected readmission refers to an unexpected admission for "further treatment of the same condition", "treatment of a condition related to one for which the patient was previously hospitalised", or "a complication of the condition for which the patient was previously hospitalised".

Numerator

Number of separations for hospitals which meet all of the criteria below: The separation is a readmission to the same hospital following an index episode of care for AMI that met all criteria in the denominator field; The principal diagnosis (PDx) code for the episode of care is one of the ICD-10- AM diagnosis codes; Care type = acute care; Urgency status = emergency; and readmission interval is 30 days.

Denominator

Total separations for management of AMI in a specified reference period meeting the criteria: Principal diagnosis of AMI, represented by any one of the following codes: Acute transmural myocardial infarction of anterior wall; Acute transmural myocardial infarction of inferior wall; Acute transmural myocardial infarction of other sites; Acute transmural myocardial infarction of unspecified site; Acute subendocardial myocardial infarction; Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified AND Care type = acute care; Urgency status = emergency.

Exclusions

Separation mode = died in hospital.

Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments

None

Stratifications

By hospital peer group

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Administrative data
Data Collection Methods

Indicator set is intended to be used by jurisdictions and private hospital ownership groups to generate hospital-level measures

Frequency of Data Collection
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
Reporting Methods

Indicators are intended to support local quality improvement activities

Reporting Frequency
Ad libitum
Reporting Frequency in Days
1
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Technical Specifications
Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Can the Quality Indicator be Readily Implemented at a Population Level in Australia Given its Current Data Landscape?
Implementation of this quality indicator was not assessed.
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
31 March 2026