Percentage of Patients With Follow-Up Visit to Family Physician Within 30 Days of Index Stroke/TIA Discharge

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Care Transitions
Country
Canada
Publishing Organisation
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario: Ontario Stroke Registry (formerly known as the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network)
Type of Quality Indicator
Process
IOM Quality Dimension
Timeliness
Domain
Follow-Up

Defining Attributes

Definition

Percentage of patients with follow-up visit to family physician within 30 days of index stroke/TIA discharge (CI95%)

Numerator

Number of patients with follow-up visit to family physician within 30 days of index stroke/TIA discharge

Denominator

Number of patients with discharged after hospitalisation for stroke/TIA.

Exclusions
Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments
Stratifications

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Administrative data, Electronic/paper chart records
Data Collection Methods

Collects primary data on the provision of acute stroke care in hospitals. Data is collected at the individual patient level. Random sample of patients 18 years of age and older discharged from the emergency department (ED) or from an inpatient stay, with a main problem/most responsible diagnosis of stroke or TIA among hospitals seeing at least 30 strokes/TIAs per year. If there was more than one stroke/TIA during the sampling period, only the first stroke/TIA event is included. Chart abstraction is performed by trained research personnel, and if chart review confirms a diagnosis of stroke or TIA, the event is included in the OSA. The OSA collects information on stroke type and severity, presenting symptoms and co-morbid conditions, and validation by duplicate chart abstraction has shown excellent agreement for key variables, including age, sex, stroke type and admission to hospital. The OSR is housed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), where it is linked to population-based administrative databases using unique encoded patient identifiers.

Frequency of Data Collection
Continuous
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
1
Reporting Methods

Publications

Reporting Frequency
Ad libitum
Reporting Frequency in Days
1
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Evidence Source

Hall, R., Sondergaard, D., Wodchis, W., Fang, J., Mondal, P., & Bayley, M. (2017). Trajectories of Stroke Care in Ontario: Which Path to Best Care? Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 44(3), 261-266. doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.440

Technical Specifications
Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
02 December 2025