Presence of Ambulance Report on Medical Record

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Care Transitions
Country
Canada
Publishing Organisation
Accreditation Canada: Trauma Distinction program Core indicators
Type of Quality Indicator
Process
IOM Quality Dimension
Efficiency
Setting-Specific Domain
Communication

Defining Attributes

Definition

Percentage of trauma patients transported from the injury scene by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the emergency department (ED) with a primary diagnosis of an injury with an ISS>12 who have an accompanying ambulance report in the medical record.

Numerator

All trauma patients transported from the injury scene by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the emergency department (ED) with a primary diagnosis of an injury with an ISS>12 who have an accompanying ambulance report in the medical record.

Denominator

All trauma patients with a primary diagnosis of an injury with an ISS>12, who were transported directly from the injury scene by EMS to the ED

Exclusions
Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments
Stratifications

Collection and Reporting Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Surveys
Data Collection Methods

An on-site visit is conducted by expert evaluators with extensive practical experience in trauma. Following the successful completion of the Trauma Distinction process, the organisation receives a Trauma Distinction Award that is valid for four years. At the end of the four years, the organisation begins a new Distinction cycle. Organisations must regularly submit indicator data between on-site visits.

Frequency of Data Collection
Organisations choosing to apply for trauma distinction have to demonstrate that they collect the data on an ongoing basis.
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
1
Reporting Methods

Trauma distinction program is a voluntary accreditation process

Reporting Frequency
Reporting Frequency in Days
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Technical Specifications
Link to Measurement Tools
Domain
Not Assigned
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
No
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Can the Quality Indicator be Readily Implemented at a Population Level in Australia Given its Current Data Landscape?
Implementation of this quality indicator was not assessed.
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
23 July 2025