Follow-Up After Hospitalisation for Mental Illness (7-Day and 30-Day Follow-Up )

Identifying Attributes

Care Settings
Care Transitions
Country
United States of America
Publishing Organisation
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Program
Type of Quality Indicator
Process
IOM Quality Dimension
Timeliness
Domain
Follow-Up

Defining Attributes

Definition

Percentage of discharges for patients 6 years of age and older who were hospitalised for treatment of selected mental illness or intentional self-harm diagnoses and who had a follow-up visit with a mental health practitioner within 7 days and 30 days after discharge.

Numerator

Number in the denominator with a follow-up visit with a mental health practitioner within 7 days and 30 days after acute inpatient discharge. Do not include visits that occur on the date of discharge.

Denominator

Number of patients 6 years of age and older who were discharged from an acute inpatient setting (including acute care psychiatric facilities) with a principal diagnosis of mental illness or intentional self-harm on or between January 1 and December 1 of the measurement period.

Exclusions

Patients who use hospice services any time during the measurement period, Clinician documented reason patient was not able to complete 7 day/30 day follow-up from acute inpatient setting discharge (e.g., patient death prior to follow-up visit, patient non-compliant for visit follow-up).

Use of Risk Adjustment
No
Risk Adjustments

None

Stratifications

7 days and 30 days of follow-up.

Data Attributes

Type of Data Collection
Administrative data
Data Collection Methods

Health plan.

Frequency of Data Collection
Annually
Frequency of Data Collection in Days
365
Reporting Methods

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Program (CMS and Providers) CMS Provider Compare (Publicly reported).

Reporting Frequency
Annually
Reporting Frequency in Days
365
Indicator Has Recommended Targets
No

Source and Reference Attributes

Link to Measurement Tools
Quality Indicator Confirmed to be Part of a Program Used to Monitor Quality and Safety of Care Among Older People at a Population-Level between 2012-2022
Yes
Assessed by the Australian Consortium for Aged Care Collaborators as Generally Containing Good Properties (Importance and Scientific Acceptability)
No
Australian Consortium for Aged Care Endorsed
No
Identified by PHARMA-Care Project
No
Upload Date
12 March 2025